Don’t Trust Zuckerberg, Bezos, Cook, or Any Leftists Bearing Gifts

Things are very quiet and everything seems to be heading in the right direction. But for conspiracy theorists, it’s TOO quiet and things are heading in the right direction TOO smoothly.

On today’s episode of The JD Rucker Show, we discussed why we shouldn’t just assume that people like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos seem to be falling in line because Donald Trump won. We have to assume that there is evil intent and the longer game is not going to play out the way things appear to be heading now.

It feels like the political winds are shifting. Major corporations and influential figures, once vocal opponents of conservative values, appear to be softening their stance. But is this sudden harmony genuine, or is something else at play? Questions linger about the intent behind these actions, and the quiet is unsettling.

Good News… Or Is It?

There’s been what some might consider “good news” lately: Vice President Kamala Harris overseeing the certification of the Electoral College vote without issue, known Trump supporter Dana White being invited to join Meta’s board, and big donations—like Apple’s Tim Cook contributing $1 million to the inauguration fund. Even traditionally “woke” companies and individuals seem eager to participate in this new chapter under Donald Trump’s presidency.

On the surface, this may feel like progress. After all, 2016 and 2017 saw widespread resistance, from riots on inauguration day to corporate backlash against the administration. But now, companies and public figures are stepping up to align with the current leadership. At least, that’s how it seems.

McDonald’s, Meta, and the Appearance of Change

Even brands like McDonald’s have distanced themselves from corporate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives, which have long been viewed as critical parts of woke agendas. Meta’s choice to add Dana White to its board only fuels speculation about a pivot in the tech giant’s values.

Mark Zuckerberg’s connection to MMA and Dana White is no secret, but appointing a high-profile Trump ally raises eyebrows. Zuckerberg famously spent $400 million to oppose Trump in 2020, so why the sudden shift?

It’s tempting to think these moves signal a new embrace of conservative ideals. But is that optimism warranted? Large corporations like Meta, Apple, or Amazon don’t change course overnight. Are we being lulled into a false sense of security?

What’s Missing: The Resistance

What’s even more suspicious: there’s no chaos. Historically, political shifts like this have met with immediate resistance. Remember the rioting of 2016? Or the protests during the “Summer of Love” in 2020? Where are the activists? Where’s the outrage?

The almost eerie calmness has set off alarm bells. Could this be a case of “the calm before the storm”?

Why Now?

This brings us to the broader question: why now? Why would figures like Zuckerberg, Cook, or even Justin Trudeau seem to change their tune? Whether political realignment, financial incentive, or long-term planning, their motives aren’t transparent.

Global elites have historically served their own interests. The sudden pivot towards conservative values contradicts their track record. These individuals aren’t known to “change their hearts.”

And if they haven’t truly changed, what’s their endgame? Could this be part of a larger play, something yet to unfold?

The Calm Before the Storm

There’s an old saying: “if something looks too good to be true, it probably is.” This silence doesn’t add up. If major figures within the global elite cabal are acting unusually cooperative, it might signal they’re working on something even bigger behind the scenes.

It’s reminiscent of scenarios in fiction where villains conspicuously behave “well” when they know they’re being watched. Could this be a misdirection of epic proportions? Are we being lulled into complacency while more sinister plans unfold?

Trust With Caution

It’s natural to want to believe in change. People love redemption stories, and conservatives tend to see the good in forward progress. But when individuals like Zuckerberg, who fought hard against Trump, suddenly toss symbolic gestures like donations or small board appointments, questions must be asked.

What does Zuckerberg gain by bringing in Dana White? Is Apple’s donation just a public relations move? Why aren’t we hearing from global influencers who were so vocal before?

Don’t Let Your Guard Down

Instead of celebrating too soon, conservatives should remain skeptical. Creating distance from woke ideology or donating to political causes shouldn’t earn these individuals blind trust. Motives matter.

Let the track records speak. Trust figures who have been consistent in their values. Believing that long-time opponents have truly changed their stance after one election sets a dangerous precedent.

Conclusion

Conservative optimism is understandable. After years of fierce opposition, the idea of unity and progress sounds promising. But caution is necessary. The quiet, the calm, and the sudden cooperation feel too convenient.

Stay vigilant. Quiet moves often lead to louder consequences. Always question the motives of those who’ve spent years opposing what they now appear to support. It’s one thing to offer a hand—it’s another to wonder if it’s holding a dagger behind its back.